Vitasta Annual Number
Vitasta URL

  Annual Publication of
Kashmir Sabha, Kolkata, India 

SEARCH
| HomeContact Us |
 <<< Back
 

Previous Issues

Volume XXXVII  (2005-2006)
Volume XXXV  (2001-2002)
Volume XXXIV (2000-2001)
Volume XXXIII (1999-2000)
Volume XXXII  (1998-1999)
 

pdf Downloads

Volume XXXVII  (2005-2006)
Volume XXXV  (2001-2002)
Volume XXXIV (2000-2001)
Volume XXXIII (1999-2000)
Volume XXXII  (1998-1999)

E-mail this page
Print this page
Feedback Corner

 

VITASTA ANNUAL NUMBER: Volume XXXIII (1999-2000)

Memorial Presented to the Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir

Kashyap Bandhu


[This article is taken from "Freedom Movement in Kashmir"]

The Honourable Prime Minister,
His Highness' Govemment,
Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu.

Sir,

May I venture to take the liberty of addressing this communication to you on the present position of the Kashmiri Pandit community in Kashmir.  Recent events have had a most detrimental effect on the economic and political and consequently the social security of the community.  In order to have a proper comprehension of the situation in which the community unfortunately finds itself placed today, I deem it necessary to outline briefly the historical background from which it has sprung and the influences which have moulded its genius as also the circumstances which today conspire to strangle that enius.  If the community is to be rescued from the doom, which, if the present circumstances remain unchecked and unremedied, is inevitable, it is necessary to put into practice the suggestions made at the conclusion of the representation.  These suggestions do not comprise any extravagant demand; they are only a claim on behalf of the community to be allowed reasonable facilities to continue its existence in a manner consistent with its past history and present achievements.

Kashmiri Brahmins have during the last two thousand years and more held a very high position in the intellectual life of India and not of India only; for Chinese historical records mention Kashmiri Brahmin missionaries propagating Buddhism in China in the early centuries of the Christian era.  Their literature and their works of art, which still are some of the finest in the world, bear testimony to their greatness.  Though today in the State they are considered an unwarlike race, in the medieval times, more than once they swept out of their mountain fastnesses and extended their sway over vast regions in India and Central Asia.  Mahmood of Ghazni who spread devastation in North India was unable to penetrate into Kashmir, and Kashmir still retained its independence for two centuries after Mussalmans had established their empire throughout the length and breadth of India.  Muslim domination in Kashmir, when it occurred, was not due to an invasion from outside but was the result of infiltration and conversions from within.  But all through the vicissitudes of centuries, the Kashmiri Brahmin community who was the flower of the population retained its individuality and notwithstanding untold hardships, kept its flag flying.  Throughout these centuries, whatever the circumstances and whoever the rulers, the Kashmiri Pandit community had a potent voice in the administration and determination of the destinies of their country.  As late as century ago it was on the initiative and with the active cooperation of the Kashmiri Pandit community that Maharaja Ranjit Singh occupied Kashmir.

Since then, as ever before, this community has rendered loyal and devoted service to the rulers of the land.  On account of their special hereditary pitude they have taken the maximum advantage of the educational facilities afforded by Goverrunent to all communities alike, and this community, so far as male literacy is concerned, is one of the most advanced in the world, as the proportion of literacy among men is practically cent per cent.  When anskrit gave place to Persian we adopted the latter language as our own, so much so that our culture is now as much Persian as Sanskritic.  When Persian gave place to English we took to the new language with the same avidity and filled the new administrative departments as we had done the old, rendering, more often than not, for a bare pittance, the same singlehearted service to Government that our ancestors had done before.  We preferred the long hours and the meagre emoluments which are the lot of subordinate functionaries in public offices to more lucrative employment because by doing so we followed the bent of our minds, as for countless generations, penmanship has been our hereditary craft and public service our hereditary occupation.  There is not a single department of the administration except the Army from which we have been debarred (though there is no such bar in the British Indian Army who contains several Kashmiri Pandits holding the King's Commission) which does not owe its reputation, such as it possesses, for efficiency primarily to the Kashmiri Pandit element in it.  From the frozen heights of Ladakh to the malaria-infested valleys of Muzzafferabad, whatever progress has been achieved in whatever branch of the administration, be it road construction, detection of crime, spread of education, provision of medical aid, the Kashmiri Pandit had had a dominant share in its achievement though being usually in a subordinate position, the only reward he has reaped for his incessant toil and hardship has been an occasional smile and a chit from his officer.

But today in spite of all the services he has rendered and all the privations he has endured, he finds himself faced with a situation which threatens him and his children with political and economic extinction.  Not only are the Kashmir Pandits deprived of their occupation of which they enjoyed almost a monopoly even under the worst of Pathan rulers, but very frequently they are also being deprived of opportunities, which, in bare justice, those who are actually in service are entitled to claim as a matter of inalienable right.  It is not denied that with the change of circumstances, communities and nations have to readjust themselves, but we urge it emphatically that it is absolutely unjust to force the pace of reorientation of the entire cultural and economic outlook of a whole community, and still more unjust to destroy the vested interests and the principal means of livelihood of a distinguished and talented race with a stroke of the pen, and without giving it time to readjust itself with the changin times.  It cannot be denied, and it were, there are facts to prove the futility of the denial, that whatever the name given to the so-called re-organisation of State administration, call it the Efficiency Commission or Committee the result is always the same; the axe falls on the head of the Kashmiri Pandit.  The whole philosophy of the remodelling of the administration can be summed up in the sentence "Whoever is in the Kashmiri Pandit must be out".  Denied the privileges of the majority on account of the smallness of our numbers, we are at the same time denied the protection due to a minority and doubly due to a minority community with our history, services and educational attainments.  We recognise the necessity of the reorientation of our outlook and we are aware of the difficulties which Government have to face under the stress of existing circumstances, but at the same we insist that Government have a definite obligation to discharge in relation to us and it would be height of injustice if that obligation is ignored and we are thrown over board.  Instances are not waiting where other Governments placed in a similar situation have acted in a fundamentally different spirit and with a sympathy worthy of admiration.  Take the case of Anglo-Indian community in India, which is much smaller in number than ours and incomparably smaller when the population of the whole of India is taken into consideration.  This community during the last 150 years has occupied a very privileged Position in the British Indian Services.  The security of this position is now threatened by the urgent demand for Indianization.  Throughout the discussion on Indian Constitutional Reform, the representatives of the Anglo-Indian community have urged that their present members in services should remain intact at least for 30 years, during which period they will be able to adjust themselves to changed circumstances and to adopt other avocations.  It is understood from the papers published a couple of weeks ago, that the British Government have in fact given a pledge that in the new constitutional changes safeguards would be devised for the economic security of the Anglo-Indian community in India.  Surely the claims of the Kashmiri Pandit community in the Jammu and Kashmir State are not less than those of the Anglo-Indian community in British India, and their case stands in the need of at least equally sympathetic consideration.  After all an answer must be provide to the question : 'What are the Kashmiri Pandits to do?' They are deprived of their hereditary occupation; Difficulties are placed in their being recognised as an agricultural community which could enable them to buy land and settle down to agriculture.  No special facilities are given to them in obtaining technical education and no encouragement provided in pursuing commercial enterprise.  Even if such facilities had been given, it would have taken many years before proper adjustment could take place, for the entire mental landscape of a community cannot be effected and re-arranged in a day.  How much longer will it take without any facilities being given?

By virtue of their religion and of the common interests as also by reason of their deep and abiding sense of loyalty Kashmiri Pandits are identified with Government by the opponents of Government.  Kashmiri Pandits are proud of this, but such an identification has serious drawbacks and under certain conditions, for example every time a clash occurs between the rising tide of education and communalism on the one side and Government on the other, the Kashmiri Pandits are the first target for attacks, as in the eyes of Muslim agitators, injury to a Kashmiri Pandit whether in the service of the Government or not of whatever sex or age, is identical with injury to Goverrunent.  Government, being an intangible thing and not easily susceptible of being overthrown, the first objective of any outburst of agitation in Kashmir is the destruction of the Kashmiri Pandits' property and sometimes of life.  We do not mention this by way of accusation or complaint, but only as a statement of fact in support of our contention that if we are attacked on one side we are entitled to being defended and strengthened by the other on whose account we are attacked.  We should not be ground to powder between the upper mill stone of the Government Retrenchment or Efficiency Commissions and the policy of exclusion from public service and lower mill stone of communal attack on our life and property by unbridled subversive agitation.  Our natural hereditary attitude, our religious obligations, our sense of duty, no less than our self interest demand that while peacefully living with other communities we should maintain steadfast loyalty towards our ruler and his Government.  But it has to be recognised that we, as a community must live and have a distinct and honourable standing compatible with our history and our attainments, and not as pariahs and strangers within the State existing on the difference of other people.  The time has come when as a community we have come to a decision and chalk out a policy to prevent our extinction and what is worse than extinction, our degradation which is progressing apace on account of the terrible unemployment prevailing amongst us.  It must be remembered that unemployment in a community like ours is a gangrene of much worse type than in other communities because all our young men are well-educated.  If they cannot turn their hands to useful things their potentiality for mischief is far greater than in the case of young men of any other mischief community.  I do not wish to be considered hysterical on the subject but the tragedy enacted before our eyes is so deep and so all prevailing that it is impossible to measure the extent of devastation already committed.  Our demands are not extravagant.  We want a guarantee for security in services in the same manner as the British overnment are giving to Anglo-Indians and the domicile Europeans in India, though our claims for such guarantees are far higher than those of these communities as the Anglo-Indians and domiciled Europeans come into existence only a century and a half ago at the earliest and we have been living in this country for thousands of years and the monuments which dot the countryside everywhere bear witness to our honourable existence.

Recognising that, in the altered conditions we will eventually, have to adopt other avocations, we want that special facilities be given to us here and now, so that the community may pass through the period of transition without the much jolting of its framework. Some of our demands are:

(1) Recognition of the Kashmiri Pandit community as an agricultural community without any disability in the sale and purchase of land in every part of the State.

(2) Special facilities in technical education by grant of special scholarships in the State and foreign technical institutions.

(3) Special facilities in the grant of Government Contracts especially in the P.W.D. and Civil Supplies where our contractors are handicapped in the interest of non-state subject,

(4) Financial aid from the Dharamarth Departmenl to start industries on the security of immovable property without interest or at least a low rate of interest.  Such aid has been granted before to certain persons of other communities.

(5) In order that our interest might be adequately represented in the proposed Assembly, at least two Kashmiri Pandit Councillors should be nominated.  This is the mere necessity as in the new franchise proposal the number of Kashmiri Hindus (Pandits) is 3 out of 75 in place of 4 out of 63 as proposed by Mr. Galancy.

Maintenance of the strength of the Kashmiri Pandit representation in the services for a period of 30 years at the figure at which it stood on 13th July 1931, on which date the present Campaign agitation was openly started.  As stated above the Kashmiri Pandits are the community which suffered the most on account of the retrenchments that have since taken place, because for one reason or the other the Departments where Kashmiri Pandits are either not employed or are employed in small numbers, for instance the Military Department and Minister-in-Waitings Department, have not been very much affected by retrenchments.  Curiously enough, even in these Departments, when retrenchment has been made, Kashmiri Pandits have principally suffered.  This demand is exactly what the Anglo-Indians are asking in British India and as it is understood are hoping to secure.

(7) There is no reason why Kashmiri Pandits should be debarred from entering into State Army, when they are given King's Commission in the British Army.

(8) If the Efficiency Commission is to be kept at all it is essential that it should contain a Kashmiri Pandit member and its procedure should be revised in such a manner that the persons affected should be given an opportunity to explain their cases before action is taken against them.  This is a matter of general public interest.

(9) (a) Special measures should be taken to protect our religious places.  What at present happens is that whenever the mood takes them, irresponsible Muslim agitators come and place a few stones in the compound or in the vicinity of our shrines and raise a Hullabaloo that the land is "Wakaf" and they will erect a mosque.  The Government when approached by us instead of warding them off appoint an Arbitration Committee to settle the dispute, though actually there is no dispute, as the land has been in the possession of Hindus for centuries.  The local authorities instead of nipping the trouble in the bud take no action until the agitation takes root and the excitement amongst people attains a high pitch.

(b) Restoration of Hindi to its former position in schools and colleges.

(10) The following measures are immediately necessary for safeguarding the interest of Kashmiri Pandits actually in service at the present moment:

(a) Kashmiri Pandits should not be prevented from promotion when they are due to them according to seniority and efficiency.

(b) They should be raised to higher positions as even according to Mr. Galancy, the proportion of the Kashmiri Pandits in the Gazetted staff is not adequate.

(c) The Headquarters of the Government should be moved as before from Srinagar to Jammu and vice-versa.  Its fixation at particular place is administratively unsound, financially useless, and in fact no real saving is made.

(d) Measures should be taken to check the propaganda in the Muslim press against Hindu officers in general and Kashmiri Pandit officers, who are specially marked for such attention, in particular.

(11) We have been asking for representation in the State council and we hope that His Highness will graciously be pleased to grant our request.

(12) Grant of area for plantation to the Kashmirl Pandit and waste lands.

We are sanguine that these requests will receive sympathetic consideration, as our memorial in 1931, The exact words of his gracious declaration are shall always continue to take a deep personal interest in all that concerns the welfare of the Kashniiri Pandit community which, though small'm numbers, is the best educated community in the State and comprises the original inhabitants of the country who have maintained their time-honoured traditions".  We take our stand on this.

I beg to remain,
Sir,
Your most obedient servant,
Kashyap Bandhu

March 1934.
Previous ArticlePrevious Article

Index

Next ArticleNext Article

 

Copyrights © 2003-2010 Kashmir Sabha, Kolkata. All Rights Reserved. 
Views expressed by authors in Vitasta Annual Number are not necessarily of Kashmir Sabha, Kolkata.